This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
Back

Blog

| 2 minute read

Cutting contractual sick pay for unvaccinated staff – is it lawful or wise?

What do IKEA, Wessex Water, Ocado and Next have in common? Not a great deal, other than when it comes to unvaccinated employees – they are heading in the same direction. 

Those unvaccinated employees will no longer be entitled to contractual sick pay when they are self-isolating because they have been identified as having been in close contact with someone with Covid-19. We haven’t seen any similar public announcements in any of the sectors we advise but they still may be on the same pathway, just with less fuss and media attention!  

Is it a lawful idea?

Many employers, presumably including our happy band above, have, during the pandemic chosen to make discretionary payments under their contractual sick pay schemes when staff are self-isolating. Usually, these schemes state that payment is only made when a member of staff is ill. 

Legally, employers can therefore remove those discretionary payments and revert to the original interpretation of the sickness policy. Self-isolating staff will remain entitled to Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) an employer cannot remove this entitlement. 

Whilst there may not be a contractual issue, there could be discriminatory issues. Staff who are not vaccinated for medical reasons* or because of pregnancy or beliefs held (note that no one has tried to argue that an anti-vaxxer stance is a protected belief as yet), should not suffer a detriment which would include a reduction in pay. 

*in the Government guidance, from 16 August 2021 individuals who are not vaccinated for medical reasons are not required to self-isolate when they are identified as close contact.

Is it a good idea?

I would hope our prime minister would agree that certain choices we make, whilst they may “technically” be lawful, are not necessarily a good idea! 

Employers are caught between a rock and a hard place; address staff absences which are crippling many sectors at the moment, or create a two-tier workforce where resentment builds and staff feel penalised for making a personal choice.  

A good idea is based on sound reasoning and strong information. Maybe a good place to start finding out whether this step is a good idea for your organisation would be to address the following:

  • Will this address your staff shortages by increasing vaccination takeup?
  • What will the “soft” cost be in terms of employee/employer relations?
  • What’s the difference between SSP and contractual sick pay – is there a material difference which justifies this decision especially in light of isolation times decreasing?
  • How would you caveat such a change to ensure that avoided discrimination issues?

If you would value a discussion about any of these issues please feel free to contact Katherine Sinclair.

Ocado and Next have cut sick pay for unvaccinated staff who must self-isolate because of Covid exposure

To make sure you receive all of our latest insights, subscribe here.

Tags

discrimination, education, employment and pensions, housing, tribunal claims, charities, health and social care, local government, social business