Apologies - this is not a blog of homage to the late great George Michael but rather a shameless use of his timeless album title to encourage you to listen to our latest podcast: 'Without prejudice' unpacked. Forgive me George!
My colleague, Katherine Sinclair (legal director) and I discuss the recent Employment Appeal Tribunal case of Garrod v Riverstone Management Ltd. The case offered some useful guidance on 'without prejudice' discussions; something rarely debated in the tribunals and yet used so regularly in practice. We discuss questions such as:
- What elements of a discussion make it without prejudice?
- When does without prejudice fall away?
- How does that fit with protected conversations?
- What are the practical considerations?
- How do you best prepare for these scenarios?
We talk through the case, raise the takeaway points and demonstrate how these apply in practice.

/Passle/5f4626f28cb62a0ab4152da6/SearchServiceImages/2025-10-28-12-37-36-709-6900b910d509f987f3f1d980.jpg)
/Passle/5f4626f28cb62a0ab4152da6/SearchServiceImages/2025-10-31-16-46-28-784-6904e7e4f45c4fc4422e2dcc.jpg)
/Passle/5f4626f28cb62a0ab4152da6/SearchServiceImages/2025-10-28-10-24-08-154-690099c8d509f987f3f15451.jpg)
/Passle/5f4626f28cb62a0ab4152da6/SearchServiceImages/2025-10-27-13-03-43-238-68ff6daf186d67c4aefa9d8d.jpg)